CHONG CARUSO
ESL91
FALL 2000
Essay Topic: Write a group essay in which you
describe the language acquisition theories of Noam Chomsky and B.F. Skinner.
Then compare and contrast these theories. Explain the analogy of the light
switch, described on p23 of your textbook Interdisciplinary English, and relate it to what Chomsky and Skinner
believed about how we acquire language.
Language
is very important for all of us because the language helps us to express our
thoughts, and feelings. We also can communicate between human beings with language. Without learning language, there would
probably be a problem for everyone.
Sociologists,
linguists and psychologists are interested in language acquisition and how we
acquire our language skills. For
example, the linguist Chomsky and
psychologist B.F. Skinner had two theories of how we learn language.
Noam
Chomsky believed that all humans have knowledge of the general grammar of their
native languages from birth. This means
children don't need to learn the general grammar rules because all children are
able to put words into the right grammatical order from birth. In other words, Chomsky believes that the
children are born with a natural inborn ability to speak simple sentences. So
children do not need to be taught their native language.
In
contrast, B. F. Skinner believed that children must learn native language grammar, and children need to
learn through the experience of communication with their peers and environment. Children usually learn the sounds and
vocabulary of their native language through their imitation of others in the
environment.
Chomsky's
and Skinner's theories are contrasting. Chomsky believed that humans have an
inborn capacity for a native language.
Skinner believed that children learn from their experience and imitate
from their environment. Consequently,
Chomsky's theory is that children can speak automatically, but Skinner's theory
shows that children learn by copying language from their parents or
environment.
Both
theories make sense to me. The two theories complement each other. Language
acquisition is a knowledge and understanding of grammar, and language is also
acquired through communication with our environment. Therefore, without an
innate ability, we can't develop our native language skills and also without
development of environment, we can't take advantage of an innate capacity. In
other words, we need to have both innate ability and learning for language
acquisition.
The
capacity for language acquisition is in our brain. Our brain comes with wires
to learn a native language. The language acquisition is very important for our
lives. If we can't communicate with each other then we will need to use the
sign language just like monkeys. So we need to learn with our innate brain
capacity.
MY RESPONSE
To
do this project, I read about two interesting theories by Noam Chomsky and B.F,
Skinner. These two scientists were interested in language acquisition. They
demonstrate how important language acquisition is for humans.
All
humans grow up with a native language so I believe that humans have an innate
capacity for language acquisition. All humans have knowledge by their
experience from birth. We experience learning language through all our lives
and we acquire knowledge of language in our natural environment. I learned once
more the importance of language acquisition.
I also learned that all humans have the capacity to learn and get more
knowledge for language acquisition. Furthermore, the human's capacity can achieve
the second language, too.
I
enjoyed working with the psychology group because we all worked and helped each
other. I thought that group working would be difficult, but we all participated
in our group working on the essay. I never had a chance to work with a group
before, and I learned how to communicate with our group. I could get more
information from different viewpoints so I could get myself to write more
clearly for my essay. The experience of working with a group was good for me at
least. On the other hand, the bad point
is that we should be able to meet more frequently in our groups.